📜 Copyright
• What it is:
• A legal right automatically given to the creator of an original work (book, music, software, etc.).
• It gives the creator exclusive rights to use, distribute, modify, and license the work.
• How it works in software:
• When you write code, you own the copyright by default.
• You can then decide:
• Keep it private,
• Sell licenses,
• Or open-source it under a license (MIT, GPL, etc.).
👉 Copyright = ownership + control.
⸻
🔄 Copyleft
• What it is:
• A licensing strategy that uses copyright law in reverse: instead of restricting sharing, it enforces sharing.
• Introduced by Richard Stallman (FSF, GNU project).
• How it works:
• Copyleft licenses (like GPL, AGPL) say:
“You can use, modify, and distribute this software freely — but if you distribute or offer it as a service, you must also share your modifications under the same license.”
• Effect:
• Ensures the software and all its derivatives remain open-source.
• Prevents companies from taking open-source software, improving it, and releasing it as closed-source.
👉 Copyleft = open-source with mandatory sharing.
⸻
⚖️ Example Contrast
Case Copyright Copyleft
You write software You automatically own the copyright You can choose to apply a copyleft license
If others use it They need your permission (license) They can use it, but must share improvements
Closed-source use Allowed (if you sell/proprietary license) Not allowed — derivatives must stay open-source
Example licenses Proprietary EULAs, MIT, Apache GPL, AGPL, LGPL
⸻
🔑 Simple Analogy
• Copyright is like “No one may copy or use my book without my permission.”
• Copyleft is like “You may copy and modify my book, but if you publish it, you must also let others copy and modify your version.”
⸻
✅ So:
• Copyright = protection & exclusivity.
• Copyleft = freedom, but with the condition that freedom must continue downstream.
⸻
👉 Would you like me to also make a diagram/visual flow showing how software changes hands differently under Copyright-only, Permissive licenses (MIT/Apache), and Copyleft (GPL/AGPL)?
No comments:
Post a Comment